Interestingly, Jody's weekly video has not appeared here, so I'm sharing a link to it now:
http://www.weldingtipsandtricks.com/cas ... lding.html
Steve S
thanks Steve, I am falling behind ,
Jody
dyFo-JP4fDQ
Comments & questions on new & past videos
- Otto Nobedder
-
Weldmonger
-
Posts:
-
Joined:Thu Jan 06, 2011 11:40 pm
-
Location:Near New Orleans
kblenker#22
- kblenker#22
-
Active Member
-
Posts:
-
Joined:Tue Jul 15, 2014 9:23 pm
-
Location:Amherst, Wi
- MosquitoMoto
-
Weldmonger
-
Posts:
-
Joined:Sat Aug 01, 2015 8:38 am
-
Location:The Land Down Under
My question, too.kblenker#22 wrote:maybe i missed it did he say what kind of filler he was using?
We have an active thread on the boards at the moment where there is some discussion of a cast pump casing that needs to be welded and which filler to use...would be handy to know which filler Jody and JD used on this job - and why.
Kym
- MosquitoMoto
-
Weldmonger
-
Posts:
-
Joined:Sat Aug 01, 2015 8:38 am
-
Location:The Land Down Under
- Otto Nobedder
-
Weldmonger
-
Posts:
-
Joined:Thu Jan 06, 2011 11:40 pm
-
Location:Near New Orleans
By the way, if anyone is interested in discussing dye-penetrant NDE, I've accumulated a lot of experience with visible dyes like Jody used, including in ASME code applications, and have more time to discuss it than he does.
Steve S
Steve S
- MinnesotaDave
-
Weldmonger
-
Posts:
-
Joined:Sun Oct 27, 2013 10:57 pm
-
Location:Big Lake/Monticello MN, U.S.A.
I found the dye check very interesting as well.
About a month ago I did a cracked Chevy truck bell housing.
Basically did just like Jody just showed about amps, slow puddling, stop drill, cleaning action, etc - except I've never dye checked anything and thought that was an AWESOME tip.
About a month ago I did a cracked Chevy truck bell housing.
Basically did just like Jody just showed about amps, slow puddling, stop drill, cleaning action, etc - except I've never dye checked anything and thought that was an AWESOME tip.
Dave J.
Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance. ~George Bernard Shaw~
Syncro 350
Invertec v250-s
Thermal Arc 161 and 300
MM210
Dialarc
Tried being normal once, didn't take....I think it was a Tuesday.
Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance. ~George Bernard Shaw~
Syncro 350
Invertec v250-s
Thermal Arc 161 and 300
MM210
Dialarc
Tried being normal once, didn't take....I think it was a Tuesday.
dirtmidget33
- dirtmidget33
-
Heavy Hitter
-
Posts:
-
Joined:Tue May 13, 2014 5:22 pm
Steve I got a question for you then, is there really any noticeable difference in the standard kit vs the nuclear kit that dynaflux makes.Otto Nobedder wrote:By the way, if anyone is interested in discussing dye-penetrant NDE, I've accumulated a lot of experience with visible dyes like Jody used, including in ASME code applications, and have more time to discuss it than he does.
Steve S
why use standard nozzles after gas lens where invented. Kinda of like starting fires by rubbing sticks together.
- Otto Nobedder
-
Weldmonger
-
Posts:
-
Joined:Thu Jan 06, 2011 11:40 pm
-
Location:Near New Orleans
I'm pretty sure the "nuclear" kit is going to be a UV penetrant, rather than visible. Since it fluoresces under blacklight, much smaller traces are detectable, making UV penetrant quite a bit more sensitive. It's more expensive in several respects, though. First being the cost of the materials. Second, of course, is a powerful enough blacklight... A good 50W longwave will set you back $400 or so, and replacement bulbs for ours were $116 last time we bought. Third is the time and material to black out all light from your test area, if your piece is too big to move to a dark room.
On a side note, don't EVER blacklight anything in the company rest room... You do NOT want to see what glows in there...
I should add, I don't use UV penetrants at this time (we have the blacklight for oxygen-clean checks), as the visible is more than sufficient for what I'm testing.
Steve S
On a side note, don't EVER blacklight anything in the company rest room... You do NOT want to see what glows in there...
I should add, I don't use UV penetrants at this time (we have the blacklight for oxygen-clean checks), as the visible is more than sufficient for what I'm testing.
- GEDC0753.JPG (181.62 KiB) Viewed 2484 times
dirtmidget33
- dirtmidget33
-
Heavy Hitter
-
Posts:
-
Joined:Tue May 13, 2014 5:22 pm
Well that would make sense however the dynaflux kit doesn't use UV light and it had same instructions for both. The only difference I found on the website for them is one is flammable and other isn't. They didn't list any other details on website which is while I enquired about it.
Here is link to kits on there site
http://weldingsupplies.dynaflux.com/vie ... eck-i-kits
Gonna try to get company I fix polaris housings for to spend money to use this stuff. I never thought about using it really, after watching Jodys video thought It would be a good idea to make sure we do get all the cracks. Have used machinst blue in past to help make some cracks more visible.
Here is link to kits on there site
http://weldingsupplies.dynaflux.com/vie ... eck-i-kits
Gonna try to get company I fix polaris housings for to spend money to use this stuff. I never thought about using it really, after watching Jodys video thought It would be a good idea to make sure we do get all the cracks. Have used machinst blue in past to help make some cracks more visible.
why use standard nozzles after gas lens where invented. Kinda of like starting fires by rubbing sticks together.
It may just have a few diferent ingredients to allow its use in a nuke plant. And it will have traceability for record keeping. Like batch numbers and such. They make a nuke grade duct tape too. The glue has a few diferent chemicals in it so that it is "approved" for use by the nrc.
I have more questions than answers
Josh
Josh
- Otto Nobedder
-
Weldmonger
-
Posts:
-
Joined:Thu Jan 06, 2011 11:40 pm
-
Location:Near New Orleans
A study of the MSDS for the two varieties shows the penetrant is the same in each kit. The developer in the nuke version is much higher in VOC, perhaps for a much faster dry time and much less residue to clean.
The cleaners are even more dramatic in difference. The non-flammable is methylene chloride, while the nuke version is essentially light Naptha.
In both cases, the "nuclear" is what I use. Sounds like marketing to me.
Steve S
The cleaners are even more dramatic in difference. The non-flammable is methylene chloride, while the nuke version is essentially light Naptha.
In both cases, the "nuclear" is what I use. Sounds like marketing to me.
Steve S
I liked in the comments (you have to read) where the guy said:
Looks worth a try if that is all you got.Q:I cant buy that dye check where I live so I use kerosene mixed with food coloring in a spray bottle. for the developer, I use Dr. Shcolls athletes foot spray and it works great.
A: that sounds like something I would do.
I am definitely going to try that.
Jump to
- Introductions & How to Use the Forum
- ↳ Welcome!
- ↳ Member Introductions
- ↳ How to Use the Forum
- ↳ Moderator Applications
- Welding Discussion
- ↳ Metal Cutting
- ↳ Tig Welding - Tig Welding Aluminum - Tig Welding Techniques - Aluminum Tig Welding
- ↳ Mig and Flux Core - gas metal arc welding & flux cored arc welding
- ↳ Stick Welding/Arc Welding - Shielded Metal Arc Welding
- ↳ Welding Forum General Shop Talk
- ↳ Welding Certification - Stick/Arc Welding, Tig Welding, Mig Welding Certification tests - Welding Tests of all kinds
- ↳ Welding Projects - Welding project Ideas - Welding project plans
- ↳ Product Reviews
- ↳ Fuel Gas Heating
- Welding Tips & Tricks
- ↳ Video Discussion
- ↳ Wish List
- Announcements & Feedback
- ↳ Forum News
- ↳ Suggestions, Feedback and Support
- Welding Marketplace
- ↳ Welding Jobs - Industrial Welding Jobs - Pipe Welding Jobs - Tig Welding Jobs
- ↳ Classifieds - Buy, Sell, Trade Used Welding Equipment
- Welding Resources
- ↳ Tradeshows, Seminars and Events
- ↳ The Welding Library
- ↳ Education Opportunities