Hello everyone
I hope you won’t mind my English, it is not my first language so please be patient
My company is working on a new product which requires some very long corner joints, material is 20 ga stainless steel. (~0,80 mm for us Europeans ).
It’s basically some sort of box, made with a “C” shaped body closed on the top and bottom with two rectangular sheets.
Users of this specific product require very high cleanability of the part - ideally, the inside of the joint should resemble a fillet. They must not have any gap or undercut or interstice where dust and dirt can settle.
We’re trying very hard and practicing on a sample shaped like this:
Dimensions are 23*15*15 inches, corner joints are highlighted. But the actual product will be more than twice the size
Unfortunately for us stainless steel is not our area of expertise (we mainly work on aluminum), so we have several questions to which we cannot find an answer. We basically know that we need to TIG weld this but that's it
But hopefully you can help me!
Based on the box shape and dimension, would you recommend an outside or inside corner weld?
Is argon back purge really necessary? We do have some copper to use but we never tried argon purge.
Parts fit up should be for an open corner joint or closed? Without filler?
Jody’s videos have been really helpful so far, in fact most of the questions come from things I learned by watching them. But there is only so much I can do without experience and any advice will be very much appreciated.
I'll see if I can post some pictures of what we managed to do.
Many thanks to anyone who will spend its time to read this long post, any feedback will be very much appreciated.
If this is not the right section of the board could the topic be moved?
Tig welding tips, questions, equipment, applications, instructions, techniques, tig welding machines, troubleshooting tig welding process
If you want a super clean inside, then I would weld outside corners. I strongly encourage you to make a purge box and clamp it to the inside corner, run Argon on the interior while welding the outside. This will eliminate any contamination of the inside corner (which will be extremely difficult to clean afterwards) and make the outside weld easier too. You can also come back weld the inside too with a lay wire technique after, just purge the outside too after the entire box cools off.
I recently did a job of stainless countertops. I took a 2”x2”x0.25” piece of square tubing. I welded some angle iron to it to make an inside square jig. I then milled off the outside edge of the tubing, and welded flat pieces on the ends. Milling the edge off opened a slot for Argon to wash the inside corner.
I went a little farther and tapped a hole to screw a quick disconnect in so I could plug a spare hose to it when I want flow, disconnect when I was not welding. Spare tank, spare hose, 1 person Argon purge.i used aluminum 0.25” material to act as a clamp, heat sink, and non-contaminating material against the stainless. This worked great for me. Customer order another $9,000 of countertops for the same work.
A little time up front making a jig made the job easy, successful, and repeatable. Plus, the jig/box I made from scrap, so that was free.
I recently did a job of stainless countertops. I took a 2”x2”x0.25” piece of square tubing. I welded some angle iron to it to make an inside square jig. I then milled off the outside edge of the tubing, and welded flat pieces on the ends. Milling the edge off opened a slot for Argon to wash the inside corner.
I went a little farther and tapped a hole to screw a quick disconnect in so I could plug a spare hose to it when I want flow, disconnect when I was not welding. Spare tank, spare hose, 1 person Argon purge.i used aluminum 0.25” material to act as a clamp, heat sink, and non-contaminating material against the stainless. This worked great for me. Customer order another $9,000 of countertops for the same work.
A little time up front making a jig made the job easy, successful, and repeatable. Plus, the jig/box I made from scrap, so that was free.
- tungstendipper
-
Weldmonger
-
Posts:
-
Joined:Sun Nov 19, 2017 10:09 am
I also would think you will have a lot of warpage due to heat.
Lincoln MP 210, Lincoln Square Wave 200,
Everlast 210 EXT
Thermal Dynamics 25 Plasma cutter
" Anything that carries your livelihood wants to be welded so that Thor can’t break it."
CJ737
Everlast 210 EXT
Thermal Dynamics 25 Plasma cutter
" Anything that carries your livelihood wants to be welded so that Thor can’t break it."
CJ737
It would be better and more cost effective if we could not weld the inside afterwards...cj737 wrote:If you want a super clean inside, then I would weld outside corners. I strongly encourage you to make a purge box and clamp it to the inside corner, run Argon on the interior while welding the outside. This will eliminate any contamination of the inside corner (which will be extremely difficult to clean afterwards) and make the outside weld easier too. You can also come back weld the inside too with a lay wire technique after, just purge the outside too after the entire box cools off.
I agree that cleaning the inside is very hard to do, especially without proper tools.
We tried some tools provided by a supplier, for a demo in our shop, which pickled and passivated the inside. But this only highlighted how poor our weld was, with no penetration on most of the weld. And no penetration means that there is a gap, which is not considered clean and thus will not be accepted by customers
But that is our problem: we do not know how to improve the inside. We need good penetration, which ensures the cleanability of the piece.
Clearly we're making some mistakes along the way, but is it the fit-up? Or the lack of purge?
Our jig is similar as well. We used some aluminum square tubes for the inside jig, which is basically a "U" shaped structure.cj737 wrote:I recently did a job of stainless countertops. I took a 2”x2”x0.25” piece of square tubing. I welded some angle iron to it to make an inside square jig. I then milled off the outside edge of the tubing, and welded flat pieces on the ends. Milling the edge off opened a slot for Argon to wash the inside corner.
I went a little farther and tapped a hole to screw a quick disconnect in so I could plug a spare hose to it when I want flow, disconnect when I was not welding. Spare tank, spare hose, 1 person Argon purge.i used aluminum 0.25” material to act as a clamp, heat sink, and non-contaminating material against the stainless. This worked great for me. Customer order another $9,000 of countertops for the same work.
Then we clamp the parts with some copper plates as well and tack them every few inches.
I have a question: do you prefer an open corner or a closed corner fit-up?
I guess you did not use filler for yor job.
Actually with aluminum tubes and copper chill bars we do not have any noticeable warpage.tungstendipper wrote:I also would think you will have a lot of warpage due to heat.
Lack of purge in your case is why the inside looks poor.
For 20ga stainless, you don't need much heat, and you should only use a thin filler wire. Honestly, if the fit is tight, you could simply run without filler and fuse the outside. With a back purge, you should see a very clean inside (especially if passivated).
For open or closed corner: with 20ga, closed corner due to thin material. BUT, if you only want to weld 1 side, you could try open, back purge, and use an 0.045 filler wire, 1/16" tungsten, #12 cup, gas lens, and 25CFH of Argon. Purge interior at around 8-10CFH. Just adjust the "open" gap to be about equal to the filler, keeping both filler and gap less than material thickness.
For 20ga stainless, you don't need much heat, and you should only use a thin filler wire. Honestly, if the fit is tight, you could simply run without filler and fuse the outside. With a back purge, you should see a very clean inside (especially if passivated).
For open or closed corner: with 20ga, closed corner due to thin material. BUT, if you only want to weld 1 side, you could try open, back purge, and use an 0.045 filler wire, 1/16" tungsten, #12 cup, gas lens, and 25CFH of Argon. Purge interior at around 8-10CFH. Just adjust the "open" gap to be about equal to the filler, keeping both filler and gap less than material thickness.
Thanks for the suggestions, we'll try that as well.cj737 wrote:Lack of purge in your case is why the inside looks poor.
For 20ga stainless, you don't need much heat, and you should only use a thin filler wire. Honestly, if the fit is tight, you could simply run without filler and fuse the outside. With a back purge, you should see a very clean inside (especially if passivated).
For open or closed corner: with 20ga, closed corner due to thin material. BUT, if you only want to weld 1 side, you could try open, back purge, and use an 0.045 filler wire, 1/16" tungsten, #12 cup, gas lens, and 25CFH of Argon. Purge interior at around 8-10CFH. Just adjust the "open" gap to be about equal to the filler, keeping both filler and gap less than material thickness.
Here's what we managed so far:
1) Half-closed corner, with the top sheet covering half of the body thickness. No filler.
Outside, polished with bristle disks
Inside, passivated
No back purge, just copper chill bars inside and outside
2) Open corner with no gap, with just the sheets edge making contact. No filler, low pulse.
Outside, passivated
Inside, passivated
No back purge, just copper chill bars inside and outside
Sample 1) has many dips/gaps. Sample 2) seems better but maybe we need to increase pulse frequency and travel speed.
What do you think?
I would go with sample 2 AND purge the inside. Purging it will help eliminate the weld bumps a little.
The copper chill bars are great to help control distortion, but do nothing for eliminating contamination.
After welding the outside, you could still come along the inside and "wash" the inside welded seam with no filler, full pulse and that will blend the corners. I don't know if you want a square inside corner, but washing does prevent a "trap area".
The copper chill bars are great to help control distortion, but do nothing for eliminating contamination.
After welding the outside, you could still come along the inside and "wash" the inside welded seam with no filler, full pulse and that will blend the corners. I don't know if you want a square inside corner, but washing does prevent a "trap area".
If you have an extruded aluminium angle and can clamp it inside the corner joint, this will minimise inside contamination without purging. With a good gapless fitup I would run pulse 2.5pps, 50% on time and 50% background current without filler except on the ends to keep the end corners intact. I would also use a peddle to maintain bead profile against heat build up. Works for me with outstanding results.
Sent using Tapatalk
Sent using Tapatalk
Flat out like a lizard drinkin'
- LtBadd
-
Weldmonger
-
Posts:
-
Joined:Sun Apr 12, 2015 4:00 pm
-
Location:Clearwater FL
-
Contact:
CJ, can you post a couple pics showing this fixture?cj737 wrote: I recently did a job of stainless countertops. I took a 2”x2”x0.25” piece of square tubing. I welded some angle iron to it to make an inside square jig. I then milled off the outside edge of the tubing, and welded flat pieces on the ends. Milling the edge off opened a slot for Argon to wash the inside corner.
Richard
Website
Website
The inside would be perfect if it could resemble a fillet, where you can't see any dip or "trap area" as you called it.cj737 wrote:I would go with sample 2 AND purge the inside. Purging it will help eliminate the weld bumps a little.
The copper chill bars are great to help control distortion, but do nothing for eliminating contamination.
After welding the outside, you could still come along the inside and "wash" the inside welded seam with no filler, full pulse and that will blend the corners. I don't know if you want a square inside corner, but washing does prevent a "trap area".
But full penetration with no bumps would be a great start
Thanks for all the advice you've given. I'll contact our supplier next week for the gas lens!
We use an aluminum square tube, with copper plates (half inch thick), then clamp the sheets to the fixture. What current would you use in your setting? 30A?Coldman wrote:If you have an extruded aluminium angle and can clamp it inside the corner joint, this will minimise inside contamination without purging. With a good gapless fitup I would run pulse 2.5pps, 50% on time and 50% background current without filler except on the ends to keep the end corners intact. I would also use a peddle to maintain bead profile against heat build up. Works for me with outstanding results.
I forgot to mention an important detail: we use a shearing machine to cut the pieces. Should we deburr the edges before welding?
Here's some 11ga (nearly 3.2mm) stainless that was sheared, open root, fuse welded. I recall being right about 94 amps, 1.2pps, 50%, 25%, #12 cup, 3/32 2%. On the inside, I clamped 2"x2"x0.25" aluminum angle (a la Coldman) because this was a letterbox.diasim wrote: I forgot to mention an important detail: we use a shearing machine to cut the pieces. Should we deburr the edges before welding?
- Attachments
-
- IMG_2224.jpg (62.05 KiB) Viewed 4678 times
Nothing fancy, but very effective.LtBadd wrote: CJ, can you post a couple pics showing this fixture?
The milled slot is the length of the countertop lip. Set up for "inside" corners.
- Attachments
-
- IMG_3217.jpg (66.98 KiB) Viewed 4680 times
-
- IMG_3216.jpg (98.57 KiB) Viewed 4680 times
diasim wrote:The inside would be perfect if it could resemble a fillet, where you can't see any dip or "trap area" as you called it.cj737 wrote:I would go with sample 2 AND purge the inside. Purging it will help eliminate the weld bumps a little.
The copper chill bars are great to help control distortion, but do nothing for eliminating contamination.
After welding the outside, you could still come along the inside and "wash" the inside welded seam with no filler, full pulse and that will blend the corners. I don't know if you want a square inside corner, but washing does prevent a "trap area".
But full penetration with no bumps would be a great start
Thanks for all the advice you've given. I'll contact our supplier next week for the gas lens!
We use an aluminum square tube, with copper plates (half inch thick), then clamp the sheets to the fixture. What current would you use in your setting? 30A?Coldman wrote:If you have an extruded aluminium angle and can clamp it inside the corner joint, this will minimise inside contamination without purging. With a good gapless fitup I would run pulse 2.5pps, 50% on time and 50% background current without filler except on the ends to keep the end corners intact. I would also use a peddle to maintain bead profile against heat build up. Works for me with outstanding results.
I forgot to mention an important detail: we use a shearing machine to cut the pieces. Should we deburr the edges before welding?
- IMG_2435.JPG (57.75 KiB) Viewed 4659 times
For 0.8mm I would set to 34amps and use the peddle to adjust as I go.
I also prefer a number 12 gas lense cup for these outside corner joints. I use the fupa cups from Jody’s weldmonger store.
Sheared edge on 0.8 should be fine without deburring. You’re going to fully penetrate anyway.
With the aluminium angle clamped firmly right into the joint you are not going to get a fillet type bead on the inside but you will get a complete shiny joint if you do it right. Practice first and fine tune your settings. Every power source is different.
Sent using Tapatalk
Flat out like a lizard drinkin'
Thanks There is almost no discoloration on your weld, good job.Coldman wrote:This was 1.2mm.
For 0.8mm I would set to 34amps and use the peddle to adjust as I go.
I also prefer a number 12 gas lense cup for these outside corner joints. I use the fupa cups from Jody’s weldmonger store.
Sheared edge on 0.8 should be fine without deburring. You’re going to fully penetrate anyway.
With the aluminium angle clamped firmly right into the joint you are not going to get a fillet type bead on the inside but you will get a complete shiny joint if you do it right. Practice first and fine tune your settings. Every power source is different.
As for the angle on the inside:
We have 2 of those plates screwed on an aluminum tube, to form a copper angle.
The plates have a small fillet on the edge, so this is what could happen with our current fit-up:
Should we mill these plates to remove the fillet and have no gap on the inside?
Definitely mill it to a corner. That’s why I suggested the extruded aluminium angle. It has a sharp corner to fill any voids without the need for machining.diasim wrote:Thanks There is almost no discoloration on your weld, good job.Coldman wrote:This was 1.2mm.
For 0.8mm I would set to 34amps and use the peddle to adjust as I go.
I also prefer a number 12 gas lense cup for these outside corner joints. I use the fupa cups from Jody’s weldmonger store.
Sheared edge on 0.8 should be fine without deburring. You’re going to fully penetrate anyway.
With the aluminium angle clamped firmly right into the joint you are not going to get a fillet type bead on the inside but you will get a complete shiny joint if you do it right. Practice first and fine tune your settings. Every power source is different.
As for the angle on the inside:
We have 2 of those plates screwed on an aluminum tube, to form a copper angle.
The plates have a small fillet on the edge, so this is what could happen with our current fit-up:
Should we mill these plates to remove the fillet and have no gap on the inside?
Sent using Tapatalk
Flat out like a lizard drinkin'
I'm working now on improving the jig based on your suggestions, I will post updates once we have welded some more samples.
But I wanted also to ask about grinding and polishing: given the strict requirements (fillet-like bead on the inside, good looking bead on the outside) what would you recommend for grinding?
But I wanted also to ask about grinding and polishing: given the strict requirements (fillet-like bead on the inside, good looking bead on the outside) what would you recommend for grinding?
Quick and small update for anyone interested: we did try to mill the jig to an angle but the end result was not what we require.
We actually made a small chamfer on the edge, so that the weld pool can "collapse" on it and take its shape,
Meaning that our product will have a chamfer on the inside, if we manage good penetration.
Besides, we cleaned and polished the parts way better than we did before, and now the inside of the weld looks very shiny with almost no discoloration, even without back purge
Amperage ended up slightly above 30A with a 1/16" tungsten.
I'll try the Dynafile two weeks from now as we arrange a demo with the supplier.
We actually made a small chamfer on the edge, so that the weld pool can "collapse" on it and take its shape,
Meaning that our product will have a chamfer on the inside, if we manage good penetration.
Besides, we cleaned and polished the parts way better than we did before, and now the inside of the weld looks very shiny with almost no discoloration, even without back purge
Amperage ended up slightly above 30A with a 1/16" tungsten.
I'll try the Dynafile two weeks from now as we arrange a demo with the supplier.
Leejohnson1313
- Leejohnson1313
-
New Member
-
Posts:
-
Joined:Thu Jun 13, 2013 9:59 am
Although not addressing welding methods directly, if you can change the way you bend up the pieces of the "box", you can greatly reduce the length of weld bead to make the finished part. Less weld length should = less chance of flaws!
Current configuration gives 2 x (15 + 23 + 15) =106 inch weld length < made from a "U" piece 15 x (15 + 23 + 15) & 2 flat pieces (15 x 23).>
2 lesser weld length options I can see are:
A. <Make the "U" piece 15 x (23 + 15 + 23) + an "L" piece 15 x (15 + 23)> Now have 2 x (15 + 23) = 76 inch weld length (71.7% of original design)
B. < make a box/pan shape fold up so only 4 each x15 inch seams need to be welded> 4 x 15 inch = 60 inch weld length (56.6% of original design) {this will involve some tight tolerance sheet metal bending, so may be too hard in practice}.
Best of luck,
Lee
Current configuration gives 2 x (15 + 23 + 15) =106 inch weld length < made from a "U" piece 15 x (15 + 23 + 15) & 2 flat pieces (15 x 23).>
2 lesser weld length options I can see are:
A. <Make the "U" piece 15 x (23 + 15 + 23) + an "L" piece 15 x (15 + 23)> Now have 2 x (15 + 23) = 76 inch weld length (71.7% of original design)
B. < make a box/pan shape fold up so only 4 each x15 inch seams need to be welded> 4 x 15 inch = 60 inch weld length (56.6% of original design) {this will involve some tight tolerance sheet metal bending, so may be too hard in practice}.
Best of luck,
Lee
Thanks for the suggestions!Leejohnson1313 wrote:Although not addressing welding methods directly, if you can change the way you bend up the pieces of the "box", you can greatly reduce the length of weld bead to make the finished part. Less weld length should = less chance of flaws!
Current configuration gives 2 x (15 + 23 + 15) =106 inch weld length < made from a "U" piece 15 x (15 + 23 + 15) & 2 flat pieces (15 x 23).>
2 lesser weld length options I can see are:
A. <Make the "U" piece 15 x (23 + 15 + 23) + an "L" piece 15 x (15 + 23)> Now have 2 x (15 + 23) = 76 inch weld length (71.7% of original design)
B. < make a box/pan shape fold up so only 4 each x15 inch seams need to be welded> 4 x 15 inch = 60 inch weld length (56.6% of original design) {this will involve some tight tolerance sheet metal bending, so may be too hard in practice}.
Best of luck,
Lee
A. Unfortunately that is not possible as we already made the fixture to weld as per our current design. Besides, making an L+U design will require two different fixtures, whereas we can currently use the same jig for both top and bottom welding
B. That would be the best solution, but consider that the final product dimensions will be bigger than the sample we're making now. We do not have the machines to work with the resulting dimensions of a folded box
Anyway, this is the inside of one of the pieces we made while testing various parameters:
Not the best one but for us progress is noticeable! With the dynafile i hope we'll get to the final result we need.
Return to “Tig Welding - Tig Welding Aluminum - Tig Welding Techniques - Aluminum Tig Welding”
Jump to
- Introductions & How to Use the Forum
- ↳ Welcome!
- ↳ Member Introductions
- ↳ How to Use the Forum
- ↳ Moderator Applications
- Welding Discussion
- ↳ Metal Cutting
- ↳ Tig Welding - Tig Welding Aluminum - Tig Welding Techniques - Aluminum Tig Welding
- ↳ Mig and Flux Core - gas metal arc welding & flux cored arc welding
- ↳ Stick Welding/Arc Welding - Shielded Metal Arc Welding
- ↳ Welding Forum General Shop Talk
- ↳ Welding Certification - Stick/Arc Welding, Tig Welding, Mig Welding Certification tests - Welding Tests of all kinds
- ↳ Welding Projects - Welding project Ideas - Welding project plans
- ↳ Product Reviews
- ↳ Fuel Gas Heating
- Welding Tips & Tricks
- ↳ Video Discussion
- ↳ Wish List
- Announcements & Feedback
- ↳ Forum News
- ↳ Suggestions, Feedback and Support
- Welding Marketplace
- ↳ Welding Jobs - Industrial Welding Jobs - Pipe Welding Jobs - Tig Welding Jobs
- ↳ Classifieds - Buy, Sell, Trade Used Welding Equipment
- Welding Resources
- ↳ Tradeshows, Seminars and Events
- ↳ The Welding Library
- ↳ Education Opportunities