Lanthanated vs. pure tungsten
Posted: Mon Jul 21, 2014 10:21 pm
Which type of electrode is easiest and best to use on Aluminum, pure tungsten or lanthanated?
Really that question is realitive. It all depends on which way you look at this. I wouldn't say one is really easier than the other because pure will ball up requiring sharpening if you need a crisp arc. Lanthinated works very well and holds a sharper tip longer but as TamJeff mentioned, pure has been used for years without trouble. I personally prefer lanthinated for everything and zirconiated for alum over pure. The real difference will be from the machine type, inverter vs rectifier.Mikechallgren wrote:Which type of electrode is easiest and best to use on Aluminum, pure tungsten or lanthanated?
Thank you for your answer, I appreciate it.MinnesotaDave wrote:If it's for your syncrowave, you won't need pure for anything in my opinion.
Thank you for all of this information. I have been hearing about lanthanated and will probably get some and give it a go. I also have some zirconiated. I have the Miller Syncrowave 180 SD. At some point I will look into an inverter machine, but for now it's the machine that I have.Superiorwelding wrote:Really that question is realitive. It all depends on which way you look at this. I wouldn't say one is really easier than the other because pure will ball up requiring sharpening if you need a crisp arc. Lanthinated works very well and holds a sharper tip longer but as TamJeff mentioned, pure has been used for years without trouble. I personally prefer lanthinated for everything and zirconiated for alum over pure. The real difference will be from the machine type, inverter vs rectifier.Mikechallgren wrote:Which type of electrode is easiest and best to use on Aluminum, pure tungsten or lanthanated?
So the question is, which tungsten do you have or you are looking at and what machine are you using?
-Jonathan
Thank you!MinnesotaDave wrote:If it's for your syncrowave, you won't need pure for anything in my opinion.
Thank you. Is it because the lanthanated doesn't ball like the pure? Or is it because it works better with inverter machines?TamJeff wrote:I've used pure for over 25 years and it just never occurred to me to try anything else. I have some Lanth at the shop though. I may revisit it and see what all the excitement is about. I remember trying it when we got the Dynasty, but then it lost favor because of the grinding step, which was one of the benefits of doing aluminum work.
I would get 1.5% or 2% (better) Lanthinated and use your zirconiated and call it a day. That should be all you need. Honestly the Lanthinated will work for everything you will do.Mikechallgren wrote:Thank you for all of this information. I have been hearing about lanthanated and will probably get some and give it a go. I also have some zirconiated. I have the Miller Syncrowave 180 SD. At some point I will look into an inverter machine, but for now it's the machine that I have.Superiorwelding wrote:Really that question is realitive. It all depends on which way you look at this. I wouldn't say one is really easier than the other because pure will ball up requiring sharpening if you need a crisp arc. Lanthinated works very well and holds a sharper tip longer but as TamJeff mentioned, pure has been used for years without trouble. I personally prefer lanthinated for everything and zirconiated for alum over pure. The real difference will be from the machine type, inverter vs rectifier.Mikechallgren wrote:Which type of electrode is easiest and best to use on Aluminum, pure tungsten or lanthanated?
So the question is, which tungsten do you have or you are looking at and what machine are you using?
-Jonathan
Thank you, I'll probably try some lanthanated.Oscar wrote:The ability for 2% lanthanated to hold a decent point (assuming you don't go crazy with the DCEP portion of the AC wave) during welding of aluminum is magnficent.
Arc Zone have them, and quality brandsGlenC wrote:. who's a good online source? Ebay?