mig and flux core tips and techniques, equipment, filler metal
Post Reply
yamahablue
  • Posts:
  • Joined:
    Thu Apr 23, 2015 4:08 pm
  • Location:
    Central Coast Ca

I've said this in my other threads but I'm brand new to welding, this is my first try at mig. I bought a millermatic 211 maybe a month ago and finally got a tank and gas for it a couple days ago. I still need a cart, gloves and some other misc items but I couldn't wait. I hooked up the gas grabbed a piece of 1/8" and ran a few beads. I didn't clean it, could that be why it has that burnt color around the welds? Also seemed to have more spatter than I expected, could that also be from not prepping it right, or not enough gas flow?

I was plugged into 230 with it on autoset at the low range of 1/8", the burn through was my first pass, I tried a couple setting it manually using the door chart and then went back to the auto set. All expect 1 were done pulling, pushing I couldn't see what I was doing, nozzle was in the way. Anyway I don't know if anything can even be seen from the pictures but here they are, also you can see it warped the crap out of the metal.

Before cleaning
Image
Bottom Image
Warpage
Image
yamahablue
  • Posts:
  • Joined:
    Thu Apr 23, 2015 4:08 pm
  • Location:
    Central Coast Ca

And here's a couple more after I hit them by hand with a wire brush, I know they aren't nice but that's why I'm posting them to maybe get some input. Oh and the last pic is the spatter fest I had first time using my friends harbor freight 90a flux core welder.
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
  • Posts:
  • Joined:
    Fri Apr 01, 2011 10:59 pm
  • Location:
    Australia; Victoria

All of that is completely normal. Especially for a first timer. The spatter is because the settings are not quite right. But tuning the machine will come with practice.
yamahablue
  • Posts:
  • Joined:
    Thu Apr 23, 2015 4:08 pm
  • Location:
    Central Coast Ca

I was surprised that it burned through, that flux core didn't and I went slower and ran longer beads. Overall this seemed hot or that I needed to move faster than expected. Is it normal for a good portion of the weld to stay glowing red after stopping?

When making changes to minimize spatter where would I start? One setting at a time or both?
User avatar
  • Posts:
  • Joined:
    Fri Apr 01, 2011 10:59 pm
  • Location:
    Australia; Victoria

Again normal, burn thru is avoided by practice regarding travel speed. The glowing red is normal. It takes a fair deal of heat to melt metal. With the spatter, it can be caused by a number of things. One being excessive wire speed. Leave the volts set where they are, and gradually lower the w/s unroll you get a nice crackle. Don't go too far or you will get a hissing popping noise.
yamahablue
  • Posts:
  • Joined:
    Thu Apr 23, 2015 4:08 pm
  • Location:
    Central Coast Ca

Thank you.
User avatar
  • Posts:
  • Joined:
    Fri Apr 01, 2011 10:59 pm
  • Location:
    Australia; Victoria

No problem mate
User avatar
  • Posts:
  • Joined:
    Wed Aug 06, 2014 12:48 am
  • Location:
    Melbourne, Australia

Mike's exactly right about the sound. It should sound like bacon sizzling in a pan. Short and sharp. I think Jody mentioned words like that in one of his videos. I remember thinking 'what an appropriate description!'
EWM Phonenix 355 Pulse MIG set mainly for Aluminum, CIGWeld 300Amp AC/DC TIG, TRANSMIG S3C 300 Amp MIG, etc, etc
yamahablue
  • Posts:
  • Joined:
    Thu Apr 23, 2015 4:08 pm
  • Location:
    Central Coast Ca

I was watching some of his mig welding videos the other night, good stuff. I don't know why it is but it looks like his travel speed is slower than I feel is possible in my case.
User avatar
  • Posts:
  • Joined:
    Thu Jan 06, 2011 11:40 pm
  • Location:
    Near New Orleans

yamahablue wrote:I was surprised that it burned through, that flux core didn't and I went slower and ran longer beads. Overall this seemed hot or that I needed to move faster than expected. Is it normal for a good portion of the weld to stay glowing red after stopping?

When making changes to minimize spatter where would I start? One setting at a time or both?
"Generally";
Too much spatter means too much wire speed for the voltage. Conversely, it can mean too little voltage for the wire speed.
Given the picture, my choice would be to increase voltage first, but I doubt you can do that much with a 90A machine.
Back the wire down until the spatter is under control.
My best suggestion based on what I see and the information you've given.

Steve S
yamahablue
  • Posts:
  • Joined:
    Thu Apr 23, 2015 4:08 pm
  • Location:
    Central Coast Ca

Otto Nobedder wrote:
yamahablue wrote:I was surprised that it burned through, that flux core didn't and I went slower and ran longer beads. Overall this seemed hot or that I needed to move faster than expected. Is it normal for a good portion of the weld to stay glowing red after stopping?

When making changes to minimize spatter where would I start? One setting at a time or both?
"Generally";
Too much spatter means too much wire speed for the voltage. Conversely, it can mean too little voltage for the wire speed.
Given the picture, my choice would be to increase voltage first, but I doubt you can do that much with a 90A machine.
Back the wire down until the spatter is under control.
My best suggestion based on what I see and the information you've given.
.

Steve S
I'll give that a try. Yeah that 90a machine only has a min and max setting and wire speed. I probably won't ever use that machine again it's my 211 that I would like to get dialed in with solid wire.
yamahablue
  • Posts:
  • Joined:
    Thu Apr 23, 2015 4:08 pm
  • Location:
    Central Coast Ca

I haven't been practicing like I should or would like to but I had a couple drops sitting in the garage and decided to run a couple beads. Hopefully the pictures show enough to get some advice from you guys.

I didn't clean the scale off of any of it and set the machine by the chart for 3/16. Doing the 3/16 to the 10g (bottom) I dropped the wire speed a little. Most of it I tried a whip I think it's called, pushing out and then back. The bottom bead, 2/3 of it on the right was just a straight push.

I would like to know if there's a way to avoid cutting into the top piece so much, maybe nozzle position?

Image
Image
yamahablue
  • Posts:
  • Joined:
    Thu Apr 23, 2015 4:08 pm
  • Location:
    Central Coast Ca

I guess I should add that this is done with the 211, 230v, .030 and 75/25 gas. The material thickness is the same that I'll be working with on my project, 3/16 flat onto 10g or so.

Hoping to get some advice so that the actual project turns out better than this.
Poland308
  • Posts:
  • Joined:
    Thu Sep 10, 2015 8:45 pm
  • Location:
    Iowa

Try focusing less on the movement pattern but more on steady even travel. This will help you get a feel for the puddle and let you watch for keeping the wire shooting at the leading edge. It will leave you with a smoother looking bead but give you some confidence.
I have more questions than answers

Josh
Backsheddave
  • Posts:
  • Joined:
    Sat Jul 19, 2014 4:46 am
  • Location:
    New Zealand

Some good advice above. Have you downloaded the Miller welding App. I've found this useful for getting welder settings close so you can fine tune from there. You say you don't have a welding cart yet. Once you get a handle on running some decent beeds, why not make your own. I did this while learning to tig aluminium, and found it an excellent learning curve. Welding out of position etc. That's my 5 cents worth.......... Enjoy!
yamahablue
  • Posts:
  • Joined:
    Thu Apr 23, 2015 4:08 pm
  • Location:
    Central Coast Ca

Thanks, I'll look into the miller welding app. Since originally starting this thread I have purchased a cart.

One of the beads pictured, at least most of it, was done without any type of motion. I'm wondering why the welds cut into the top of the thicker material so much but dont look to be tied in well on the bottom. Maybe cause the mil scale?
User avatar
  • Posts:
  • Joined:
    Thu Jan 06, 2011 11:40 pm
  • Location:
    Near New Orleans

yamahablue wrote:Thanks, I'll look into the miller welding app. Since originally starting this thread I have purchased a cart.

One of the beads pictured, at least most of it, was done without any type of motion. I'm wondering why the welds cut into the top of the thicker material so much but dont look to be tied in well on the bottom. Maybe cause the mil scale?
The mill scale will affect tie-in on the bottom, but in a lap joint it's very hard not to cut in to the top edge, especially when it's sharp. A point is where heat will concentrate most, having nowhere to go, and it will melt quickly and unpredictably. Try chamfering over the corner on the top piece, to make a slightly rounded edge, and this problem will be reduced. Only hood time will eliminate it.

Steve S
yamahablue
  • Posts:
  • Joined:
    Thu Apr 23, 2015 4:08 pm
  • Location:
    Central Coast Ca

Thank you, that's good to know. I'll give that a try.
Backsheddave
  • Posts:
  • Joined:
    Sat Jul 19, 2014 4:46 am
  • Location:
    New Zealand

Could also be something as simple as gun angle. Maybe a slight eeeeeeee pattern may help, really it's about having a bit if a play with the advice given and what works for you.
yamahablue
  • Posts:
  • Joined:
    Thu Apr 23, 2015 4:08 pm
  • Location:
    Central Coast Ca

I tried prying up on the top piece to see what would happen. I knew the tie in looked questionable on the 10g but I didn't expect that the weld would lift completely off. It wasn't very easy to pry it up but definitely didn't penetrate. The little glob that stuck might have been a tack weld, not sure why it seperated from the weld. This was the section I tried just a straight stringer bead.

The end circled in red I used some forward and back movement, it seemed to be holding on better.

I'm a little surprised considering the machine was set closer to the thicker metal setting. Is this the result of welding over mil scale? Also, is it difficult to get fusion welding onto a tack weld?

Image

Image
Post Reply