Short Run
Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2014 5:10 am
Short Run, meaning, not enough in the budget to make a jig or a pattern really, or essentially building in prototype mode. It's typically a fine line with trying to keep parts affordable enough to a customer you hope to keep doing business with. It's where the old tricks of the hands on part of the trade come in handy when trying to make parts with any degree of predictable repetitiveness. Not the tubes so much. I can bend those with my mind in my sleep by now. In this case, the deal was, use what was available in the shop, which amounted to obtaining stock from different drops of 3/8" plate. I sized the parts to an even 4" so that in the future, I can simply use 4" x 3/8" flat bar and gain some economy there with the cutting phase later on down the road.
It's an oddball size, so cutting the parts out of a piece of existing channel was out of the question. There can be some kind of adaptation later on, with some thought, I imagine.
Here is the subject. A water blasting crawler that scales the sides of ships, held on by suction.
Which needs a roll cage. The use of aluminum is entirely experimental as these parts were made of SS prior. To hand cut and drill 1/4" SS flat bar on short notice, or to economically have them cut elsewhere for so few parts was the deciding factor as was the schedule.
Instead of using one, 1/4" stainless steelplate for the sling eyes, it has two 3/8 aluminum that does away with the clevices they currently use. Just a bolt or pin thru a cable eye instead.
The pipe is double wall sched forties making an 80. A 3/4", 6061-O inner, with a 1", 5052 outer. The 5052 takes a puddle quicker and welds faster and in theory, keeps heat stress/brittleness to a minimum. You can use those 'fudgy', fat aluminum welds on this material that end up being rather tough, without creating a fracture zone right at the edge of the weld and without undercut or overlap. The two wall, sched 80 buildup also helps alleviate this, over that of a single wall 80 construct. Is it overkill or in vain? Perhaps. . .but all we can do is try and guess when time is of essence.
At any rate, I made the deadline and used almost to the inch, what material we had readily available.
It's an oddball size, so cutting the parts out of a piece of existing channel was out of the question. There can be some kind of adaptation later on, with some thought, I imagine.
Here is the subject. A water blasting crawler that scales the sides of ships, held on by suction.
Which needs a roll cage. The use of aluminum is entirely experimental as these parts were made of SS prior. To hand cut and drill 1/4" SS flat bar on short notice, or to economically have them cut elsewhere for so few parts was the deciding factor as was the schedule.
Instead of using one, 1/4" stainless steelplate for the sling eyes, it has two 3/8 aluminum that does away with the clevices they currently use. Just a bolt or pin thru a cable eye instead.
The pipe is double wall sched forties making an 80. A 3/4", 6061-O inner, with a 1", 5052 outer. The 5052 takes a puddle quicker and welds faster and in theory, keeps heat stress/brittleness to a minimum. You can use those 'fudgy', fat aluminum welds on this material that end up being rather tough, without creating a fracture zone right at the edge of the weld and without undercut or overlap. The two wall, sched 80 buildup also helps alleviate this, over that of a single wall 80 construct. Is it overkill or in vain? Perhaps. . .but all we can do is try and guess when time is of essence.
At any rate, I made the deadline and used almost to the inch, what material we had readily available.